Explorar el Código

fix analogtodigital: remove rounding

Frank Haverland hace 3 años
padre
commit
0f6c767143

+ 6 - 5
code/components/jomjol_flowcontroll/ClassFlowCNNGeneral.cpp

@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ string ClassFlowCNNGeneral::getReadout(int _analog = 0, bool _extendedResolution
     if (GENERAL[_analog]->ROI.size() == 0)
         return result;
     if (debugdetailgeneral) LogFile.WriteToFile("ClassFlowCNNGeneral::getReadout _analog=" + std::to_string(_analog) + ", _extendedResolution=" + std::to_string(_extendedResolution) + ", prev=" + std::to_string(prev));
-
+ 
     if (CNNType == Analogue || CNNType == Analogue100)
     {
         float zahl = GENERAL[_analog]->ROI[GENERAL[_analog]->ROI.size() - 1]->result_float;
@@ -147,7 +147,6 @@ int ClassFlowCNNGeneral::ZeigerEvalHybridNeu(float zahl, float zahl_vorgaenger,
 
     if (AnalogerVorgaenger)
     {
-//        result = ZeigerEvalAnalogToDigitNeu(zahl, eval_vorgaenger);
         result = ZeigerEvalAnalogToDigitNeu(zahl, zahl_vorgaenger, eval_vorgaenger);
         if (debugdetailgeneral) LogFile.WriteToFile("ClassFlowCNNGeneral::ZeigerEvalHybridNeu - Analoger Vorgänger, Bewertung über ZeigerEvalAnalogNeu = " + std::to_string(result) +
                                                     " zahl: " + std::to_string(zahl) + " zahl_vorgaenger = " + std::to_string(zahl_vorgaenger)+ " eval_vorgaenger = " + std::to_string(eval_vorgaenger) + " DigitalUnschaerfe = " +  std::to_string(DigitalUnschaerfe));
@@ -218,12 +217,14 @@ int ClassFlowCNNGeneral::ZeigerEvalAnalogToDigitNeu(float zahl, float ziffer_vor
 
     if ((ziffer_vorgaenger >= DigitalUebergangsbereichVorgaengerAnalogToDigit ) && (ziffer_vorgaenger <= (10.0 - DigitalUebergangsbereichVorgaengerAnalogToDigit)))
     {
+       /* Bei DigitalUebergangsbereichVorgaengerAnalogToDigit verursacht runden weitere Fehler
         // kein Ziffernwechsel, da Vorgänger weit genug weg ist (0+/-DigitalUebergangsbereichVorgaenger) --> zahl wird gerundet
         if ((ergebnis_nachkomma <= 2) || (ergebnis_nachkomma >= 8))     // Band um die Ziffer --> Runden, da Ziffer im Rahmen Ungenauigkeit erreicht
-            result = ((int) round(zahl) + 10) % 10;
-        else
             result = ((int) trunc(zahl) + 10) % 10;
-
+        else
+            result = ((int) round(zahl) + 10) % 10;
+        */
+        result = ((int) trunc(zahl) + 10) % 10;
         if (debugdetailgeneral) LogFile.WriteToFile("ClassFlowCNNGeneral::ZeigerEvalAnalogToDigitNeu - kein Ziffernwechsel, da Vorkomma weit genug weg = " + std::to_string(result) +
                                                     " zahl: " + std::to_string(zahl) + " ziffer_vorgaenger = " + std::to_string(ziffer_vorgaenger) + " DigitalUnschaerfe = " +  std::to_string(DigitalUnschaerfe));
         return result;

+ 0 - 107
code/test/components/jomjol-flowcontroll/test_cnnflowcontroll.cpp

@@ -1,107 +0,0 @@
-#include <unity.h>
-#include <ClassFlowCNNGeneral.h>
-
-class UnderTestCNN : public ClassFlowCNNGeneral {
-    public:
-    using ClassFlowCNNGeneral::ZeigerEvalAnalogNeu;
-    using ClassFlowCNNGeneral::ZeigerEvalHybridNeu;
-    using ClassFlowCNNGeneral::ClassFlowCNNGeneral;
-    
-};
-
-
-/**
- * @brief test if all combinations of digit 
- * evaluation are running correctly
- */
-void test_ZeigerEval() 
-{
-    UnderTestCNN undertest = UnderTestCNN(nullptr, Digital100);
-
-    // the 5.2 is already above 5.0 and the previous digit too (3)
-    printf("Test 5.2, 3\n");
-    int result = undertest.ZeigerEvalAnalogNeu(5.2, 3);
-    TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(5, result);
-
-    // the 5.2 is already above 5.0 and the previous digit not (9)
-    // so the current digit shoult be reduced (4.9)
-    printf("Test 5.2, 9\n");
-    TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(4, undertest.ZeigerEvalAnalogNeu(5.2, 9));
-
-    printf("Test 4.4, 9\n");
-    // the 4.4 (digital100) is not above 5  and the previous digit (analog) too (9.3)
-    TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(4, undertest.ZeigerEvalAnalogNeu(4.4, 9));
-
-    printf("Test 4.5, 0\n");
-    // the 4.5 (digital100) is not above 5  and the previous digit (analog) too (9.6)
-    TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(4, undertest.ZeigerEvalAnalogNeu(4.5, 0));    
-
-}
-
-/**
- * @brief test if all combinations of digit 
- * evaluation are running correctly
- */
-void test_ZeigerEvalHybrid() {
-    UnderTestCNN undertest = UnderTestCNN(nullptr, Digital100);
-
-    // the 5.2 and no previous should round down
-    printf("ZeigerEvalHybridNeu(5.2, 0, -1)\n");
-    TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(5, undertest.ZeigerEvalHybridNeu(5.2, 0, -1));
-
-    // the 5.3 and no previous should trunc to 5
-    printf("ZeigerEvalHybridNeu(5.3, 0, -1)\n");
-    TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(5, undertest.ZeigerEvalHybridNeu(5.3, 0, -1));
-
-    printf("ZeigerEvalHybridNeu(5.7, 0, -1)\n");
-    // the 5.7 and no previous should trunc to 5
-    TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(6, undertest.ZeigerEvalHybridNeu(5.7, 0, -1));
-
-    // the 5.8 and no previous should round up to 6
-    printf("ZeigerEvalHybridNeu(5.8, 0, -1)\n");
-    TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(6, undertest.ZeigerEvalHybridNeu(5.8, 0, -1));
-
-    // the 5.7 with previous and the previous between 0.3-0.5 should round up to 6
-    TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(6, undertest.ZeigerEvalHybridNeu(5.7, 0.4, 1));
-
-    // the 5.3 with previous and the previous between 0.3-0.7 should round down to 5
-    TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(5, undertest.ZeigerEvalHybridNeu(5.3, 0.7, 1));
-
-    // the 5.3 with previous and the previous <=0.5 should trunc to 5
-    TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(5, undertest.ZeigerEvalHybridNeu(5.3, 0.1, 1));
-
-    // the 5.3 with previous and the previous >=9.5 should reduce to 4
-    TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(4, undertest.ZeigerEvalHybridNeu(5.3, 9.6, 9));
-
-    // the 5.7 with previous and the previous >=9.5 should trunc to 5
-    TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(5, undertest.ZeigerEvalHybridNeu(5.7, 9.6, 9));
-
-    // the 4.5 (digital100) is not above 5  and the previous digit (analog) not over Zero (9.6)
-    TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(4, undertest.ZeigerEvalHybridNeu(4.5, 9.6, 0));    
-
-    // the 4.5 (digital100) is not above 5  and the previous digit (analog) not over Zero (9.6)
-    TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(4, undertest.ZeigerEvalHybridNeu(4.5, 9.6, 9));    
-    // the 4.5 (digital100) is not above 5  and the previous digit (analog) not over Zero (9.5)
-    TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(4, undertest.ZeigerEvalHybridNeu(4.5, 9.5, 9));    
-
-    // 59.96889 - Pre: 58.94888
-    // 8.6 : 9.8 : 6.7
-    // the 4.4 (digital100) is not above 5  and the previous digit (analog) not over Zero (9.5)
-    TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(8, undertest.ZeigerEvalHybridNeu(8.6, 9.8, 9));    
-
-    // pre = 9.9 (0.0 raw)
-    // zahl = 1.8
-    TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(2, undertest.ZeigerEvalHybridNeu(1.8, 9.0, 9));    
- 
-    // if a digit have an early transition and the pointer is < 9.0 
-    // prev (pointer) = 6.2, but on digital readout = 6.0 (prev is int parameter)
-    // zahl = 4.6
-    TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(4, undertest.ZeigerEvalHybridNeu(4.6, 6.0, 6));    
- 
-    
-    // issue #879 vorgaenger is -1, zahl = 6.7
-    //TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(7, undertest.ZeigerEvalHybrid(6.7, -1.0, -1));    
-
-
-}
-

+ 16 - 0
code/test/components/jomjol-flowcontroll/test_flowpostprocessing.cpp

@@ -303,6 +303,20 @@ void test_doFlow() {
         result = process_doFlow(analogs, digits, Digital100, false, true, -3);
         TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL_STRING(expected_extended, result.c_str());
 
+       // Fehler bei V12.0.1 
+        // Lokal
+        digits = { 9.8, 9.8, 1.9, 0.9, 0.9, 9.9, 2.9, 4.8};  // 169.3493 als falsches Ergebnis
+        analogs = { 5.5};
+        expected = "211.0345";
+        expected_extended= "211.03455";
+        
+        // extendResolution=false
+        result = process_doFlow(analogs, digits, Digital100, false, false, -3);
+        TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL_STRING(expected, result.c_str());
+
+        // checkConsistency=false und extendResolution=true
+        result = process_doFlow(analogs, digits, Digital100, false, true, -3);
+        TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL_STRING(expected_extended, result.c_str());
 
 }
 
@@ -388,9 +402,11 @@ std::string process_doFlow(std::vector<float> analog, std::vector<float> digits,
     }
 
     string time;
+ 
     // run test
     TEST_ASSERT_TRUE(undertestPost->doFlow(time));
 
+ 
     return undertestPost->getReadout(0);
 
 }

+ 19 - 3
code/test/test_suite_flowcontroll.cpp

@@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
 #include <unity.h>
-#include "components/jomjol-flowcontroll/test_cnnflowcontroll.cpp"
 #include "components/jomjol-flowcontroll/test_flowpostprocessing.cpp"
 // SD-Card ////////////////////
 #include "nvs_flash.h"
@@ -8,6 +7,24 @@
 #include "driver/sdmmc_host.h"
 #include "driver/sdmmc_defs.h"
 static const char *TAGMAIN = "main";
+#define __SD_USE_ONE_LINE_MODE__
+#include "server_GPIO.h"
+
+
+
+
+void initGPIO()
+{
+    gpio_config_t io_conf;
+    //set as output mode
+    io_conf.mode = gpio_mode_t::GPIO_MODE_INPUT;
+    //bit mask of the pins that you want to set,e.g.GPIO18/19
+     io_conf.pull_down_en =  gpio_pulldown_t::GPIO_PULLDOWN_ENABLE;
+    //set pull-up mode
+    io_conf.pull_up_en =  gpio_pullup_t::GPIO_PULLUP_DISABLE;
+    //configure GPIO with the given settings
+    gpio_config(&io_conf);
+}
 
 bool Init_NVS_SDCard()
 {
@@ -80,11 +97,10 @@ bool Init_NVS_SDCard()
  */
 extern "C" void app_main()
 {
+  initGPIO();
   Init_NVS_SDCard();
   UNITY_BEGIN();
 
-//  RUN_TEST(test_ZeigerEval);
-//  RUN_TEST(test_ZeigerEvalHybrid);
   RUN_TEST(test_doFlow);
   
   UNITY_END();